Join now to get access to this content and more.
Become a SOAP member and have access to our benefits.
- For Review: SOAP Consensus Statement on Neuraxial Procedures in Thrombocytopenic Parturients
- Sample Centers of Excellence Applications
- ASA Corner
- SOAP Policy and Procedure Manual (P&P Manual)
- SOAP Expert Opinions
- SOAP's Learning Modules
- 2019 Annual Meeting Lecture Videos
- December 2018 - SOAP Unofficial Guide to ASA Committees Webinar
- Submit a Position
- View Job Postings
- Previous Meeting Archives
- Previous Meeting Abstract Search
- CMS Guidelines
- Member Benefits
- Newsletter Clinical Articles
- ACOG Documents
- Search our Patient Safety Archive
- Ask SOAP a Question
- Global Health Opportunities
- And more…
A UK national survey on the use of filter needles in drawing drugs for intrathecal use
Abstract Number: 97
Abstract Type: Other
Introduction: Existing literature shows that glass particle contamination occurs upon opening of glass ampoules.1 The use of filter needles, to aspirate drugs from glass ampoules, has been shown to significantly reduce glass particle contamination.2 In the majority of hospitals in UK, drugs for intrathecal (spinal) use are presented in single-use glass ampoules. We present the results of a national survey on the use of filter needles in drawing up drugs for intrathecal use.
Methods: A web link to an online questionnaire was sent to all the NHS anaesthetists in UK, through their department secretaries. We received responses from 1171 anaesthetists, which included 623 consultants, 103 Associate Specialists and Staff Grades, and 413 trainees. 44% of the respondents were involved in providing obstetric anaesthesia.
Results: 4.4% (n=51) and 6.7% (n=78) do not use a filter needle to draw up the intrathecal dose of local anaesthesia and adjuvant drug, respectively. The majority, 77.6% (n=904), draw up the local and the adjuvant in different syringes and then mix the two prior to injection. Of these, 16.2% (n=154), mix the two by injecting from one syringe into the other through the same filter needle, thus negating the purpose of the filter. The majority, 60% (n=569), however, mix the two using a separate non-filter needle. 16% (n=193) draw the LA and the adjuvant into the same syringe. A small number, 2.8% (n=33), inject the LA and the adjuvant separately.
Discussion: The results show that a significant number of anaesthetists do not use a filter needle, and a greater number, use it incorrectly. If the results are extrapolated to the whole anaesthetic body, an alarming number of patients are being exposed to glass particles either by omission or the incorrect use of filter needles.Animal studies have shown that glass particles can cause inflammatory reactions and granuloma formation in various body tissues.3 In the interest of patient safety, the correct use of a filter needle can mitigate the risk of instilling glass particles into the intrathecal space. Another aspect that needs to be considered, is the potential microbiologic contamination caused by these galss particles, and the need for micro filters.
1.Carbone-Traber K, Shanks C. Glass particle contamination in single-dose ampoules. Anaesthesia 1986;65:1361-1363.
2.Sabon RL, Cheng EY, Stommel KA, Hennen CR. Glass particle contamination: Influence of aspiration methods and ampoule types. Anaesthesia 1989; 70:859-862.
3.Waller DG, George CF. Ampoules, infusions and filters. Br Med J 1986; 273:714