///2010 Abstract Details
2010 Abstract Details2018-05-01T17:52:49+00:00

Distribution of Anesthesia Workload in Two Labor and Delivery (L&D) Suites at An Academic Medical Center

Abstract Number: 118
Abstract Type: Original Research

Josue Rivera BS, MS1 ; Pamela Flood MD2; Vanessa E Hennig-Roshong 3; Shelby H Davies 4; Gregory V Hebert BS5; Richard M Smiley MD, PhD6

There is interest in describing and potentially controlling anesthesiology workload, focusing on operating room efficiency [1-3]. Little data exists describing work patterns in L&D units; a recent letter described cesarean (CS) and total delivery patterns by day of the week at one institution [4]. We examined the pattern of anesthesia/analgesia intervention for cesarean section (CS) and labor analgesia (LAB) in order to describe the daily workload pattern in two different L&D suites. Here we present the hourly distribution of anesthetic interventions (labor analgesia (LAB) and anesthesia for cesarean section).

METHODS: Data was gathered in two L&D suites covered by the Departments of Ob/Gyn and Anesthesiology of our university medical center. One is an "academic" high-risk tertiary referral site with ~4500 deliveries annually (designated ACAD), and the other is a low-risk "community" obstetric service with ~2400 deliveries (COMM). The time of every anesthetic intervention (LAB and CS) in both locations for the year 2008 were entered into an electronic database. Anesthetic interventions were assigned to 1 of 4 "time bins." Bin 1: 0000-0559; bin 2: 0600-1159; bin 3: 1200-1759; bin 4:1800-2359. Mean number of anesthetic interventions was compared within sites by one-way ANOVA. After normalization of number of interventions by site, interventions of each type by bin were compared between L&Ds by unpaired t-tests,

RESULTS: At ACAD, there were differences in CS, with more in bins 2 and 3 than in 1 and 4 (Figure). For LAB, there was a similar although less marked pattern, with the lowest intervention rate during bin 4 (1800-2359). There was much less variation by time at COMM. There were significant differences between the two sites in normalized CS numbers during time bins 1, 2, and 4 (p< 0.003), and the only time bin with a small difference (higher at COMM) in normalized LAB procedures was bin 4.

CONCLUSIONS: The time pattern of anesthetic interventions may differ due to obstetric and nursing practice, patient populations, and/or staffing issues. There may be common patterns to services that share similar clinical characteristics. Further statistical analysis of the timing of interventions by weekday, weekend, holiday etc. may reveal even more predictable patterns than this initial analysis.

REFERENCES: 1.Anesth Analg 2001;92:1493-8; 2.Anesth Analg 2006;102:1491-500; 3.Anesth Analg 2006;103:1499-516; 4.Anesthesiology 2008;109:161-2



SOAP 2010